The Greatest Con on Earth.
“The trick is as
follows. The con operator pulls
10,000 names out of the phonebook.
He mails a bullish letter to one half of the sample, and a bearish
letter to the other half. The
following month he selects names of the persons to whom he mailed the letter
whose prediction turned out to be right, that is 5,000 names. The next month he does the same with the
remaining 2,500 names, until the list narrows down to 500 people. Of these there will be 200 victims (who
think this guy can predict the market brilliantly by now). An investment in a few
thousand dollars worth of postage stamps will turn into several million dollars
(unwitting fools deposits who bought the story).” Then the Con Artist
elopes with the money obviously.
Fooled by Randomness, Taleb, p146.
So what are the real two greatest cons as I see it?
(Feel free to rip me apart if you disagree – I can take it).
1. Ever seen “Boiler Room”, or “Wolf of Wall Street,” where
cold calling stockbrokers target large numbers of marks with their HOT pick? If they are correct, they then re-call
and re-call until they grab the whale’s investment and commissions. If they are wrong they simply disappear
(sounds familiar to the above story right!?)
2. And I think this is even worse. Mutual funds have great fact sheets showing their
performance against some benchmark, with confusing YTD numbers and tables that
fool most people into believing some amazing fund manager is in place charging
1.5%, consistently beating the market, whilst also beating, or ignoring
randomness. (You are sold the
story that the picks matter – but remember Russian Roulette?).
But due to survivorship bias, the bad funds are never even
seen, as they are gone. But the
news is rarely shown, as are the size of the failures, or that if you invest
now, whether that fund will exist in five years due to underperformance or not,
as fund management companies don’t like to talk about those closures.
“Closed for subscription” is something I have seen several
times (and owned)…. until the fund quietly fades into the night, or is rolled
into another. The Fund Management Company
might not mail or call you, as they are subtler. They simply advertise and promote the winning survivor funds
– then net even larger numbers of people to join it.
In 2001-2012 – 7% of all funds failed every single
year! That’s not just lost money,
that’s FAILED.
ETF’s have also failed at a high rate, even in market growth
conditions. And, fair enough, some
of the ETF failures have been specific obscure ones, but at least the major
trackers of a whole index or industry should be somewhat immune.
The following article I think gets it wrong though a
little. “While some of the deaths are simply due
to bad timing, closures help weed out weaker players and lead to higher-quality
products.” Perhaps, but
more importantly: NO, it just leaves the survivors to date, some of which will
be the next to fail, whilst allowing a batch of new “great” ETF investments to
lure the next whale, at their recent publicised success.
No comments:
Post a Comment